铰接矿车电液闭式液压直驱折腰随动转向系统能量分析

Energy analysis of the articulated mining car’s electrohydraulic closed hydraulic direct drive folding waist follow-up steering system

  • 摘要: 在全球环境污染和能源危机日益加剧的背景下,提升装备部件及系统效率已成为行业共识。矿山铰接车辆凭借其卓越的转弯半径和狭窄巷道适应性,在矿业领域备受瞩目。然而,传统阀控式液压铰接转向系统因结构和管路设计的局限,导致压力损失大、回油背压高,能效明显偏低。为此,提出采用电液闭式液压直驱折腰随动转向系统构型,在阐述其工作原理的基础上,建立包含前后车体运动、车轮旋转以及电液直驱转向在内的多自由度动力学模型,对折腰转向过程的能耗进行理论分析。基于现有WXJ15矿用重型铰接式支架搬运车实验平台,在给定工况下,对电液闭式液压直驱与传统阀控折腰转向系统的能耗情况进行测试对比分析。结果表明:在相同的循环工况中,电液闭式直驱转向构型所消耗的能量仅为传统阀控全液压系统的42.57%。进一步分析发现,传统阀控液压转向系统能量损耗主要源自液压机械转向阀的节流损耗,其占比高达61.5%,而在电液闭式液压直驱折腰系统的能量损耗中,主泵能量损失构成了该系统的主要功率损失源,承担约96.8%的能量损耗。与传统阀控液压转向系统相比,电液闭式液压直驱转向系统在电能消耗上节省了15.4%,相同电能下所完成的总转向功提升了27.5%,单位电能转向功提高了43.5%。

     

    Abstract: Against the backdrop of increasing global environmental pollution and energy crisis, enhancing the efficiency of equipment components and systems has become a consensus in the industry. With their exceptional turning radius and adaptability to narrow roadways, articulated mining vehicles have garnered significant attention in the mining sector. However, due to the limitations of their structural and pipeline design, traditional valve-controlled hydraulic articulated steering systems exhibit significant pressure losses, high return oil backpressure, and relatively low energy efficiency. Therefore, the adoption of an electro-hydraulic closed-loop hydraulic direct-drive articulated steering system configuration is proposed. Based on the elaboration of its working principle, a multi-degree-of-freedom dynamic model encompassing the movement of the front and rear vehicle bodies, wheel rotation, and electro-hydraulic direct-drive steering is established to theoretically analyze the energy consumption during the articulated steering process. Utilizing the existing WXJ15 heavy-duty articulated support handling vehicle for mining experiments, a comparative analysis of the energy consumption of the electro-hydraulic closed-loop hydraulic direct-drive and traditional valve-controlled articulated steering systems under given working conditions was conducted. The results indicate that, under the same cyclic working conditions, the energy consumed by the electro-hydraulic closed-loop direct-drive steering configuration is only 40% of that of the traditional valve-controlled full hydraulic system. Further analysis reveals that the primary source of energy loss in the traditional valve-controlled hydraulic steering system is throttling loss from the hydraulic steering valve, accounting for up to 61.5% of the total loss. In contrast, the main source of energy loss in the electro-hydraulic closed-loop hydraulic direct-drive articulated system is the energy loss of the main pump, accounting for approximately 96.8% of the total loss. Compared to the traditional valve-controlled hydraulic steering system, the electro-hydraulic closed-loop hydraulic direct-drive steering system achieves a 15.4% reduction in electrical energy consumption, a 27.5% increase in total steering work accomplished under the same electrical energy, and a 43.5% improvement in steering work per unit of electrical energy.

     

/

返回文章
返回