采动地表沉陷全过程预计方法与存在问题分析

崔希民, 车宇航, MALINOWSKAA, 赵玉玲, 李培现, 胡青峰, 康新亮, 白志辉

崔希民, 车宇航, MALINOWSKAA, 等. 采动地表沉陷全过程预计方法与存在问题分析[J]. 煤炭学报, 2022, 47(6): 2170-2181. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.FQ22.0009
引用本文: 崔希民, 车宇航, MALINOWSKAA, 等. 采动地表沉陷全过程预计方法与存在问题分析[J]. 煤炭学报, 2022, 47(6): 2170-2181. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.FQ22.0009
CUI Ximin, CHE Yuhang, MALINOWSKA A, et al. Method and problems for subsidence prediction in entire process induced by underground mining[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2022, 47(6): 2170-2181. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.FQ22.0009
Citation: CUI Ximin, CHE Yuhang, MALINOWSKA A, et al. Method and problems for subsidence prediction in entire process induced by underground mining[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2022, 47(6): 2170-2181. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.FQ22.0009

采动地表沉陷全过程预计方法与存在问题分析

基金项目: 

河北省自然科学基金生态智慧矿山联合基金资助项目(E2020402086);国家自然科学基金资助项目(51474217)

详细信息
    作者简介:

    崔希民(1967-),男,辽宁宽甸人,教授,博士生导师。E-mail:cxm@cumtb.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: TD327

Method and problems for subsidence prediction in entire process induced by underground mining

  • 摘要: 精确、可靠的开采沉陷预计结果既是井下工作面优化设计、采动损害程度评价的重要依据,也是土地复垦、生态重建设计和老采空区地表再利用稳定性评价的基础。随着实践认识的提高,开采沉陷的研究热点也逐渐从传统的移动稳定的终态预计转向采动地表移动变形的动态预计;当连续6个月累计下沉不超过30 mm时,则认为传统的采动地表移动已经停止,但随着冒落破碎岩石的压实压密导致的缓慢残余下沉仍将持续,且残余下沉的预计也逐渐引起了研究者的重视。基于采动地表移动规律,将采动地表沉陷移动全过程划分为2个阶段:第1个阶段是包括初始期、活跃期和衰退期的地表动态移动变形期;第2个阶段为衰退期结束后的残余下沉期。针对第1个阶段,分析了现有预计方法的优缺点,提出了基于时间函数与概率积分法结合的开采沉陷动态过程预计方法和时空基准,明确指出了只考虑时间而不考虑开采过程进行动态预计、对比验证的错误,强调了终态预计只是动态预计的一个特例,且该动态预计只适用于滞后下沉而不适用于残余下沉的预计。针对第2个阶段,顾及冒落破碎岩石压实压密引起的残余下沉量小,基于衰退期下沉与残余下沉的连续性、残余下沉线性衰减性,给出了给定地质采矿条件下地表残余下沉持续时间和年度残余下沉系数表达式,可以定量计算残余下沉期内任一年度的残余下沉、累计残余下沉和未来潜在残余下沉,实现了采动地表沉陷的全过程预计。针对采动地表沉陷全过程预计方法研究现状,分析提出了动态过程预计存在的计算单元划分、不规则工作面、临近工作面相互影响等问题,以及残余下沉预计存在的诸如冒落破碎岩石压实压密系数、煤柱损伤与垮塌影响、预计的计算范围、预计结果的可靠性与不确定度等问题,为后续进一步研究提供了方向参考。
    Abstract: Accurate and reliable prediction of mining subsidence is not only the important basis for the optimal design of underground work face and the evaluation of surface mining damage, but also for the design of land reclamation and ecological reconstruction, and the reasonable evaluation of the stability and suitability for old mining surface subsidence areas.With the progress of theoretical study and practice, the research hotspot has been changed from the final static prediction to the progressive surface subsidence with time.Once less than 30 mm of accumulative surface subsidence occurs in six months in the weakening period, the traditional surface movement ends, which indicates stabilized surface.However, under the action of the long-term load for overburden rock strata, the residual surface subsidence will continue with the compactions of broken roof rocks, bed separations, and cracks in overburden, considerable attention has been devoted to the subject of the residual subsidence prediction.Based on the law of mining surface movement, the entire process of mining subsidence is divided into two stages.The first stage is the progressive subsidence including initial, active and weakening periods, and the second stage is named residual surface subsidence after the weakening period.For the first stage, the advances and defects are analyzed and the principle of progressive mining subsidence, which is a combined time function and probabilistic integral method, is given.The spatio-temporal datum of progressive prediction for multi-working face mining is proposed.It must be noted that the progressive prediction and comparison are not sufficient only considering the time without underground mining.The final mining subsidence is a special case of progressive subsidence under the condition of time infinity.That is to say that this method is suitable to predict the delayed subsidence at the end of the weakening period but not suitable to predict the residual surface subsidence after the weakening period.For the second stage, based on the continuity of surface subsidence at the end of the weakening period and the residual subsidence in the first year, and a linear monotonic decrease in the residual subsidence factor because of the smaller residual subsidence, the expressions of duration and annual residual subsidence factor are achieved.The quantitative calculation of the duration and annual residual surface subsidence factor can be carried out under the given geo-mining conditions.From the point of view of the current status for the entire process of mining subsidence prediction, the problems of computational element length, irregular working face, and the mining effect of vicinity working faces for progressive surface subsidence are discussed.The existing problems for residual surface subsidence related to compacting factor for broken rocks, damaged and crushed effect of coal pillars, calculating area for prediction, reliability and uncertainty for prediction, etc.are also proposed and discussed.All those problems can be consulted and remain to be solved in the future.
  • 期刊类型引用(24)

    1. 李佳臻,杨志涛,刘刚,傅永帅,张峰. 采动覆岩动态运移对地表沉陷的影响. 黑龙江科技大学学报. 2025(01): 26-31 . 百度学术
    2. 王朋飞,祝壮,孙中光,曲越,张衡,李培现. 长壁工作面开采时间间隔对倾向主断面地表沉陷的影响研究. 采矿与安全工程学报. 2025(02): 282-293 . 百度学术
    3. 张亮亮,程桦,姚直书,王晓健. 深部开采地表移动延续时间预测模型及其参数分析. 岩土力学. 2024(02): 577-587 . 百度学术
    4. 姜燕,连晗,席东河. 地表沉陷预测的改进BP神经网络模型. 金属矿山. 2024(02): 205-211 . 百度学术
    5. 孙庆先,张勇,陈清通,李宏杰. 我国开采沉陷学70年研究综述及技术展望. 中国矿业. 2024(03): 86-99 . 百度学术
    6. 李浩,陈永春,李兵,孙宏杰. 淮南矿区某拟建电厂采煤塌陷区建设地基稳定性评价. 能源技术与管理. 2024(02): 161-165 . 百度学术
    7. 秦忠诚,高广慧,李晓禾,席天乐. M-CM-GA-BP算法的地表移动变形参数预测模型. 黑龙江科技大学学报. 2024(03): 360-366 . 百度学术
    8. 石力帆,廉旭刚,韩雨. 基于粒子群算法最优化Verhulst模型的开采残余下沉预测. 科学技术与工程. 2024(18): 7592-7598 . 百度学术
    9. 寸得欣,令狐昌卫,马一奇,尹林虎,陈庆松,刘振南,涂春霖. 基于GIS和加权信息量模型的富源县地质灾害易发性评价. 科学技术与工程. 2024(18): 7563-7573 . 百度学术
    10. 郎博,张立群. 煤矿覆岩离层注浆减沉技术研究及应用. 煤炭工程. 2024(06): 66-72 . 百度学术
    11. 李国平,谷海静,郭冬冬. 基于Gompertz函数的矿区地表下沉预测方法. 陕西煤炭. 2024(11): 156-161 . 百度学术
    12. 赵文. 深部条带采空区注浆治理后场地稳定性评价. 中国煤炭地质. 2024(12): 44-48+55 . 百度学术
    13. 张亮亮,程桦,姚直书,王晓健. 煤层开采地表移动初始期、活跃期和衰退期延续时间预测模型研究. 煤炭学报. 2024(S2): 530-541 . 本站查看
    14. 袁德宝,闫若鹏,张玲,张力彪,耿程兴. 改进的残差修正DGM(1, 1)模型在煤矿地表沉降预测中的应用. 北京测绘. 2023(01): 120-125 . 百度学术
    15. 胡振琪,李根生,袁冬竹. 东部煤粮复合区采煤沉陷地边采边复时机. 煤炭学报. 2023(01): 373-387 . 本站查看
    16. 王汉元,赵頔,敖嫩,段丞,王明君,祁帅,贾旭,邓燕,武建强. 东胜煤田典型煤矿开采沉陷变形破坏研究. 中国煤炭. 2023(04): 73-79 . 百度学术
    17. 韩磊,杨科,王天君,于祥,裴春敏,许起,何祥. 采动覆岩离层注浆地表沉陷“四区”控制模型及应用. 煤炭科学技术. 2023(08): 23-35 . 百度学术
    18. 肖自义,万晓,焦仕学,李波. 6305综放工作面厚表土层薄基岩地表下沉运动特征及原因分析. 煤炭技术. 2023(10): 36-39 . 百度学术
    19. 王志红,任金铜,阎跃观,刘吉波,张琰君. InSAR联合矢量倾角分段函数模型计算矿区地表下沉量. 测绘科学. 2023(08): 169-181 . 百度学术
    20. 王文才,吴周康,王鹏,苏保山,杨少晨. 基于多函数交叉的地表动态沉陷预测模型及应用. 煤矿安全. 2023(10): 154-160 . 百度学术
    21. 李全生,刘举庆,李军,张成业,郭俊廷,王兴娟,冉文艳. 矿山生态环境数字孪生:内涵、架构与关键技术. 煤炭学报. 2023(10): 3859-3873 . 本站查看
    22. 刘小庆,黄强,池明波,魏世荣,张帅. 强采动地表双向主断面动态运移及特征边界反演. 中国矿业. 2023(11): 187-196 . 百度学术
    23. 张亮亮,程桦,姚直书,王晓健. 基于改进Knothe时间模型的地表移动延续时间预测. 煤炭学报. 2023(11): 4001-4010 . 本站查看
    24. 王建华,孟中能,施峰,关金锋. 热力耦合作用下气化炉顶板下沉规律与相关参数. 煤炭学报. 2023(S2): 514-526 . 本站查看

    其他类型引用(16)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  262
  • HTML全文浏览量:  4
  • PDF下载量:  795
  • 被引次数: 40
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-01-03
  • 修回日期:  2022-02-14
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-04-09

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    x 关闭 永久关闭