中深层地热开采技术与智能化发展综述

A review of intelligent exploitation technologies for middle-deep geothermal energy

  • 摘要: 近年来,以多源数据融合、机器学习和数字孪生为代表的智能化方法逐步应用于地热勘探、钻井建井、取热优化和运行调控等环节,为中深层地热开发由经验设计和离线评价向数据感知、动态预测和协同决策转变提供了技术支撑。为了明确中深层地热能智能化开采技术的适用条件、主要瓶颈及发展方向,为中深层地热资源高效、低风险和可持续开发提供参考,采用资料梳理、案例归纳与技术比较相结合的方法,系统分析了国内外中深层地热开发利用现状,梳理了智能勘探与靶区优选、智能钻井与开发优化、抽水回灌取热、封闭式循环取热、既有地下工程空间资源化利用以及智能化运行调控与可持续优化等方面的研究进展,对比了不同取热方式的适用条件、工程约束和智能化适配特征。结果表明:多源数据融合、机器学习和深度学习等方法可提高地质、地球物理、地球化学、遥感、测井和历史井资料的综合利用效率,为隐伏热储识别和靶区优选提供支撑;随钻数据感知、机械钻速预测、工况识别、代理模型、数据同化和物理约束模型可用于钻井参数优化、热储参数预测和取热方案快速比选。抽水回灌取热适用于出水能力、回灌条件和井间连通关系相对明确的水热型热储,但长期运行受回灌堵塞、热突破、水化学变化和采灌平衡制约;封闭式循环取热对天然地热流体和回灌能力依赖较低,更适用于回灌受限、地下水保护要求较高或以岩体导热换热为主的地层,但取热性能受井深、地温梯度、岩体热物性、井型结构、循环参数和井筒热阻共同控制。增强型地热系统、二氧化碳循环取热、地热与碳捕集、利用与封存耦合以及地下储热−释热等方向拓展了中深层地热开发边界;废弃油气井、废弃矿井、井巷空间和采空区等既有地下工程空间可作为工程应用载体,其利用方式需依据热储条件、空间完整性、改造成本、运行安全和地面热负荷需求进行适配评价。运行调控阶段需综合地下热储压力场、温度场、回灌能力、热突破风险、井筒换热、设备状态和用户侧负荷变化,推动智能预测与调度、预测性维护、闭环井控优化和数字孪生在井筒−热储−地面系统协同控制中的应用。中深层地热智能化开采的关键在于建立贯穿资源识别、钻井建井、取热方案优化和运行调控的连续反馈机制,后续需加强全过程数据标准化、物理模型与数据驱动方法融合、现场长期监测和工程验证。

     

    Abstract: In recent years, intelligent methods represented by multi-source data fusion, machine learning and digital twins have been increasingly applied to geothermal exploration, drilling and completion, heat extraction optimization and operational regulation, providing technical support for the transition of middle-deep geothermal development from experience-based design and offline evaluation to data sensing, dynamic prediction and collaborative decision-making. To clarify the applicable conditions, major bottlenecks and development trends of intelligent exploitation technologies for middle-deep geothermal energy, and to provide references for efficient, low-risk and sustainable development, research progress in middle-deep geothermal development in China and abroad was systematically analyzed through data synthesis, case summarization and technical comparison. Progress in intelligent exploration and target-area optimization, intelligent drilling and development optimization, heat extraction by pumping and reinjection, closed-loop heat extraction, resource utilization of existing underground engineering carriers, and intelligent operational regulation and sustainable optimization was reviewed. The applicable conditions, engineering constraints and intelligent adaptation characteristics of different heat extraction methods were compared. The results show that multi-source data fusion, machine learning and deep learning can improve the integrated utilization of geological, geophysical, geochemical, remote-sensing, well-logging and historical well data, thereby supporting the identification of hidden geothermal reservoirs and target-area optimization. Real-time drilling data sensing, rate of penetration prediction, drilling condition identification, surrogate models, data assimilation and physics-constrained models can be used for drilling parameter optimization, geothermal reservoir parameter prediction and rapid comparison of heat extraction schemes. Heat extraction by pumping and reinjection is suitable for hydrothermal reservoirs with relatively clear water productivity, reinjection conditions and inter-well connectivity, but its long-term operation is constrained by reinjection clogging, thermal breakthrough, hydro chemical changes and production-reinjection balance. Closed-loop heat extraction is less dependent on natural geothermal fluids and reinjection capacity, and is more suitable for formations with limited reinjection conditions, high groundwater protection requirements or dominant conductive heat transfer in rock masses. However, its performance is controlled by well depth, geothermal gradient, rock thermal properties, well configuration, circulation parameters and wellbore thermal resistance. Enhanced geothermal systems, CO2-based heat extraction, integration of geothermal energy with carbon capture, utilization and storage, and underground thermal energy storage and recovery further extend the development scope of middle-deep geothermal energy. Existing underground engineering carriers, including abandoned oil and gas wells, abandoned mines, mine roadways and goaf areas, can be utilized according to geothermal reservoir conditions, spatial integrity, reconstruction cost, operational safety and surface heat demand. During operational regulation, geothermal reservoir pressure and temperature fields, reinjection capacity, thermal breakthrough risk, wellbore heat transfer, equipment status and user-side heat load should be comprehensively considered, so as to promote the application of intelligent prediction and scheduling, predictive maintenance, closed-loop well control optimization and digital twins in the collaborative control of the wellbore-reservoir-surface system. The key to intelligent exploitation of middle-deep geothermal energy lies in establishing a continuous feedback mechanism across resource identification, drilling and completion, heat extraction scheme optimization and operational regulation. Further efforts are needed in whole-process data standardization, integration of physical models and data-driven methods, long-term field monitoring and engineering verification.

     

/

返回文章
返回