廖新杰, 张世红, 张雄, 邵敬爱, 王贤华, 杨海平, 陈汉平. 煤泥-矸石-末煤混燃交互作用及反应动力学[J]. 煤炭学报, 2021, 46(S1): 457-467. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2020.0983
引用本文: 廖新杰, 张世红, 张雄, 邵敬爱, 王贤华, 杨海平, 陈汉平. 煤泥-矸石-末煤混燃交互作用及反应动力学[J]. 煤炭学报, 2021, 46(S1): 457-467. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2020.0983
LIAO Xinjie, ZHANG Shihong, ZHANG Xiong, SHAO Jingai, WANG Xianhua, YANG Haiping, CHEN Hanping. Interaction and kinetics during the co-combustion process of coal slime, coal gangue and slack coal[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2021, 46(S1): 457-467. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2020.0983
Citation: LIAO Xinjie, ZHANG Shihong, ZHANG Xiong, SHAO Jingai, WANG Xianhua, YANG Haiping, CHEN Hanping. Interaction and kinetics during the co-combustion process of coal slime, coal gangue and slack coal[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2021, 46(S1): 457-467. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2020.0983

煤泥-矸石-末煤混燃交互作用及反应动力学

Interaction and kinetics during the co-combustion process of coal slime, coal gangue and slack coal

  • 摘要: 通过热重实验研究了煤泥、矸石、末煤的单独燃烧特性及其混燃特性,并且对混燃过程中燃料间的交互作用和反应动力学进行了分析。结果表明:煤泥和末煤的燃烧过程仅为1个阶段,即为挥发分和焦炭的燃烧,而矸石的燃烧过程则分为2个阶段,包括挥发分和焦炭的燃烧及硅酸盐矿物的分解。3种燃料中矸石的着火温度最高,煤泥和末煤的着火温度比较接近,而燃烬温度则呈现与之相反的变化趋势,即末煤>煤泥>矸石,从综合燃烧特性指数与可燃性指数来看,末煤的燃烧性能最好,煤泥次之,矸石最差。3种燃料混燃时着火温度和燃烬温度实验值均低于理论计算值,综合燃烧特性指数及可燃指数实验值则高于理论计算值。且混合燃料的综合燃烧特性指数及可燃性指数与燃料比(固定碳含量/挥发分含量)之间呈正线性相关性。3种燃料混燃时在400~800℃存在明显的交互作用,两两混合时,煤泥与矸石及末煤与矸石之间交互作用强于煤泥与末煤;3种混合时,随着燃料中矸石或末煤比例的提高,混烧过程中的交互作用逐渐增强。动力学分析结果表明,煤泥、矸石、末煤单独燃烧及混合燃烧过程均符合一级化学反应级数模型(O1)。单独燃烧时,煤泥和末煤的活化能比较接近,分别为69.6和63.8 kJ/mol,矸石的活化能最高,为85.3 kJ/mol。3种燃料混烧时的活化能为63.2~76.3 kJ/mol,混烧时活化能的实验值低于理论计算值。

     

    Abstract: The combustion and co-combustion characteristics of coal slime, coal gangue and slack coal were studied by thermogravimetric experiments, and the interaction and kinetics during the co-combustion process were analyzed.The results showed that the combustion process of coal slime and slack coal was divided into one stage, corresponding to the combustion of volatiles and char, while the combustion process of coal gangue was divided into two stages: combustion of volatiles and char and decomposition of silicate mineral.The ignition temperature of coal gangue was the highest among the three fuels, while the ignition temperature of coal slime and slack coal were relatively close, but the burnout temperature of the three fuels arranged in descending order was: slack coal>coal slime>coal gangue.In terms of the comprehensive combustion index and the combustibility index, the combustion performance of slack coal was the best, followed by coal slime, and coal gangue is the worst.During co-combustion, the experimental values of the ignition temperature and the burnout temperature of the blended fuels were lower than the theoretical values, while the experimental values of the comprehensive combustion index and the combustibility index were higher than the theoretical values.Besides, there was a positive linear correlation between the comprehensive combustion index and combustibility index of the blended fuels with fuel ratio(Ratio of fixed carbon to volatile matter content).Meanwhile, there existed obvious interaction between the three fuels at 400-800 ℃,when they were mixed in pairs, the interaction between coal slime/coal gangue or slack coal/coal gangue was stronger than that between coal slime and slack coal, when the three fuels were mixed, the interaction became stronger as the proportion of coal gangue or slack coal increased.Kinect analysis indicated that the chemical first order reaction(O1) was the most effective mechanism for the combustion and co-combustion of coal slime, coal gangue and slack coal.For individual combustion, the activation energy of coal slime and slack coal are 69.6 kJ/mol and 63.8 kJ/mol, respectively, while the activation energy of coal gangue is higher, which is 85.3 kJ/mol.The activation energies of the blends are ranging from 63.2 to 76.3 kJ/mol, and the experimental activation energy of the blends were lower than the theoretical one.

     

/

返回文章
返回