景国勋, 孙跃, 班涛, 彭乐, 贺祥. 非火焰区阻塞板对瓦斯爆炸压力的影响试验[J]. 煤炭学报, 2021, 46(S1): 312-318. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2020.1205
引用本文: 景国勋, 孙跃, 班涛, 彭乐, 贺祥. 非火焰区阻塞板对瓦斯爆炸压力的影响试验[J]. 煤炭学报, 2021, 46(S1): 312-318. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2020.1205
JING Guoxun, SUN Yue, BAN Tao, PENG Le, HE Xiang. Influence of obstacles on shock wave propagation of gas explosion[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2021, 46(S1): 312-318. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2020.1205
Citation: JING Guoxun, SUN Yue, BAN Tao, PENG Le, HE Xiang. Influence of obstacles on shock wave propagation of gas explosion[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2021, 46(S1): 312-318. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2020.1205

非火焰区阻塞板对瓦斯爆炸压力的影响试验

Influence of obstacles on shock wave propagation of gas explosion

  • 摘要: 为研究非火焰区阻塞板对管道内不同位置瓦斯爆炸压力变化的影响规律,建立18 m长拱形管道试验平台,并基于Fluent软件,分析没有阻塞板条件下,及在非火焰区安设0.2阻塞比的阻塞板条件下6.75,11.25 m处瓦斯爆炸压力和火焰变化。研究阻塞板在非火焰区对不同测点瓦斯爆炸压力峰值的影响,定性分析了3种阻塞比对6.75 m处压力峰值的影响规律,揭示了非火焰区内阻塞板对瓦斯爆炸影响的作用机理。结果表明:没有阻塞板条件下,管道内各测点压力峰值随距离增加呈先增大后减小再增大的趋势,且11.25 m处压力峰值大于6.75 m处;在非火焰区增加阻塞板,冲击波与反射波共同作用促使管道内最大压力出现在6.5 m处;增加阻塞比为0.2的阻塞板,管道内6.75 m处压力峰值大于没有增加阻塞板条件下在此处的压力峰值;增加阻塞比为0.6的阻塞板时,瓦斯爆炸火焰传播受到反射波抑制作用,最大压力明显减小,增加阻塞比为0.2,0.4,0.6等3种工况条件下,6.75 m处瓦斯爆炸压力峰值的增加呈先增大后减小的变化趋势;在0.25 m处点火,管道内出现2处反应团,0.25 m后的瓦斯团对爆炸压力具有较大影响,0~0.25 m处反应速度较慢;由于管道形状及点火位置的限制,拱形管道下端火焰传播速度较快,增加阻塞比为0.2的阻塞板,模拟结果得出火焰收缩时间点提前15 ms,且4号、7号测点处压力下降趋势变缓;模拟结果中阻塞板后的压力变化明显,利用模拟分析冲击波的反射对火焰的影响具有局限性。

     

    Abstract: In order to study the influence of non-flame area blocking plate on gas explosion pressure in different positions in the pipeline, an 18 m long arch pipe test platform was established, besides, based on FLUENT software, the gas explosion pressure and flame change at 6.75 m and 11.25 m positions without blocking plate and with 0.2 blocking rate in non-flame area were simulated and analyzed.This paper studies the change of the gas explosion pressure peak value at different measuring points by the blocking plate in the non-flame area, qualitatively analyzes the influence law of the three blocking rates on the pressure peak value at 6.75 m, and analyzes the action mechanism of the blocking plate on the gas explosion in the non-flame area.The results show that under the condition of no blocking plate, the peak pressure of each measuring point in the pipeline increases first, then decreases and then increases with the increase of distance, and the peak pressure at 11.25 m is greater than that at 6.75 m.When the blocking plate is added in the non-flame area, the maximum pressure in the pipeline appears ahead of time to 6.5 m due to the joint action of shock wave and reflected wave.When the blocking plate with blocking ratio of 0.2 is increased, the pressure peak at 6.75 m in the pipeline is increased.When the blocking ratio is 0.6,the flame propagation of gas explosion is restrained by reflected waves.Compared with 0.2 and 0.4 blocking rates, the maximum pressure in the pipeline decreases obviously.The peak pressure of gas explosion at 6.75 m increases first and then decreases with the increase of blocking ratio.When ignition occurs at 0.25 m, two reaction groups appear in the pipeline, the gas mass after 0.25 m has a great influence on the explosion pressure, and the reaction speed at 0-0.25 m is slow.Due to the limitation of pipe shape and ignition position, the flame propagation speed at the lower end of arch pipe is faster, and the blocking plate with 0.2 blocking rate is added.The simulation results show that the flame contraction time point is 15 ms ahead of time, and the pressure drop trend at No.4 and No.7 measuring points becomes slow.In the simulation results, the pressure changes obviously after the blocking plate, and the influence of the simulated shock wave reflection on the flame is limited.

     

/

返回文章
返回