薛香玉,王长安,邓磊,等. 基于全生命周期的富油煤原位热解碳排放[J]. 煤炭学报,2023,48(4):1773−1781. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2022.0444
引用本文: 薛香玉,王长安,邓磊,等. 基于全生命周期的富油煤原位热解碳排放[J]. 煤炭学报,2023,48(4):1773−1781. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2022.0444
XUE Xiangyu,WANG Chang’an,DENG Lei,et al. Carbon emissions from in-situ pyrolysis of tar-rich coal based on full life cycle analysis method[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2023,48(4):1773−1781. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2022.0444
Citation: XUE Xiangyu,WANG Chang’an,DENG Lei,et al. Carbon emissions from in-situ pyrolysis of tar-rich coal based on full life cycle analysis method[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2023,48(4):1773−1781. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2022.0444

基于全生命周期的富油煤原位热解碳排放

Carbon emissions from in-situ pyrolysis of tar-rich coal based on full life cycle analysis method

  • 摘要: 控制碳排放已成为当前和未来中国社会必须解决的重大战略问题。在碳达峰的目标愿景下,煤炭行业亟需更加安全、高效和低碳的利用方法。中国西部的富油煤资源丰富,但多被直接用于燃烧发电,造成资源浪费和环境污染。富油煤原位热解提供了一种全新的煤提油路径。该方法在原位将煤炭转化为油气资源,与传统煤炭开采手段相比,减小了采空区体积,岩体结构变形损伤小,可减轻对地质构造的破坏和环境污染。但作为一个起步阶段的研究方向,鲜见到对其从全生命周期角度进行的碳排放评价。采用全生命周期(LCA)的评价方法,对富油煤原位热解项目从煤层改造、原位加热、产品加工、产品输运以及进入消费终端的全过程碳排放量进行了分析。同时,与煤间接液化和煤直接液化的碳排放清单进行了横向对比,系统分析了富油煤原位热解的碳排放量。研究结果表明,采用低碳能源是实现富油煤原位热解绿色低碳发展的关键,电力来源为常规电网时,处理1 t煤原位热解的LCA碳排放量约为2.234 5 t (以CO2计);而电力来源为新能源风电时,处理1 t煤原位热解的LCA碳排放量仅为0.608 6 t (以CO2计)。与煤间接液化和煤直接液化相比,富油煤原位热解具有明显的碳减排优势。为有效降低碳排放量,需综合运用多种减排措施,包括提高能效利用、优化加热方式以及加大清洁能源比例等。

     

    Abstract: The control of carbon emissions has already become a great social strategic problem in China which must be solved at present and in the future. It is imperative to carry out safe, efficient, and low-carbon utilizations in the coal industry under the target of achieving carbon emission peak. Tar-rich coal is abundant in western China. It is mostly combusted for power generation, which results in the wastage of valuable resources and serious environmental pollution. The in-situ pyrolysis process of tar-rich coal provides a new method for generating oil from coal. This method is to produce oil without mining coal while alleviating damage and pollution to geological formations. Compared with traditional coal mining methods, it can reduce the size of goaf section and minimize the damage to rock structure. As a new coal-to-oil route, the in-situ pyrolysis of oil-rich coal is still at an initial stage for research, for which there are still few carbon emission evaluations from the perspective of the full life cycle analysis. Based on the carbon emission accounting method widely adopted, the life cycle analysis (LCA) is employed to analyze the carbon dioxide emission in the whole process of an in-situ tar-rich coal pyrolysis project, including coal seam modification, in-situ heating, product processing, product transportation and terminal consumption. A lateral comparison of greenhouse gas inventory with indirect coal liquefaction and direct coal liquefaction is also carried out. At the same time, the greenhouse gas emission from the in-situ pyrolysis of tar-rich coal is analyzed systematically. The results show that it is necessary to adopt low-carbon energy in the development of in-situ pyrolysis of oil-rich coal. With power grid as the energy source, the LCA carbon emission of in-situ pyrolysis is about 2.234 5 t CO2 for each tonne of coal treated, while with wind power as the energy source, merely 0.608 6 t CO2. The in-situ pyrolysis of tar-rich coal has an obvious advantage in carbon emission reduction over indirect or direct coal liquefaction process. To reduce carbon emissions effectively, several mitigation measures need to be combined, including promoting energy efficiency, optimizing heat sources, and increasing the proportion of clean energy.

     

/

返回文章
返回