秦勇, 易同生, 汪凌霞, 金军, 周泽, 孔维敏. 面向项目风险控制的煤炭地下气化地质条件分析[J]. 煤炭学报, 2023, 48(1): 290-306.
引用本文: 秦勇, 易同生, 汪凌霞, 金军, 周泽, 孔维敏. 面向项目风险控制的煤炭地下气化地质条件分析[J]. 煤炭学报, 2023, 48(1): 290-306.
QIN Yong, YI Tongsheng, WANG Lingxia, JIN Jun, ZHOU Ze, KONG Weimin. Analysis of geological conditions for risk control of UCG project[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2023, 48(1): 290-306.
Citation: QIN Yong, YI Tongsheng, WANG Lingxia, JIN Jun, ZHOU Ze, KONG Weimin. Analysis of geological conditions for risk control of UCG project[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2023, 48(1): 290-306.

面向项目风险控制的煤炭地下气化地质条件分析

Analysis of geological conditions for risk control of UCG project

  • 摘要: 煤炭地下气化(UCG)是中国煤炭工业发展的必然选择,地质风险控制是 UCG 项目成败与 否的首要基础。 立足这一背景,将钻井式 UCG 项目风险控制总目标分解为建炉地质可行性、气化 生产易控性、气化过程安全性、开发生产经济性 4 个子目标,探讨地质条件与潜在风险之间因果关 系,提出了 UCG 地质分析与评价新思路。 分析认为,UCG 炉高质量建造体现在井壁稳定性和井眼 轨迹可控性 2 个方面,前者关键地质因素是煤体结构或强度,后者主要受控于煤层厚度、结构、产状 及其稳定性。 UCG 生产易控性地质评价聚焦于 2 个目标:一是气化工作面推进易控性,倾角适中 的煤层有利于 UCG 工作面推进,燃点过高煤层工作面推进难度较大,复杂煤层结构不利于气化,微 构造是 UCG 过程控制的不利因素;二是 UCG 层内通道易控性,通道易控性随煤层埋深增大而显著 降低,高黏结高膨胀性煤层会严重危害通道畅通程度,高灰熔点和高热稳定性煤层更易保持通道畅 通性。 UCG 过程安全性地质分析同样包括 2 个方面:其一,UCG 生产安全性,涌水量过大带来安全 生产隐患,上覆足够厚度隔水层及其稳定性是保障生产安全的关键;其二,UCG 环境安全性,UCG 地面沉降总体上并不显著,有机物污染潜势与煤种高度相关,中 ~ 难挥发性有害元素对地下水环境 的危害性需高度关注。 UCG 开发经济性主要涉及气化有效性、合成气质量、资源可靠性 3 个方面, 与煤的化学反应性、灰分产率、煤田勘查程度、煤炭资源量等因素密切相关,地下气化-煤层气联采 则是提高 UCG 经济性的可探索途径。 实际上,多数地质因素均与上述 4 个 UCG 风险控制子目标 相关联,不同程度上存在交叉影响,需依据相对贡献参与 UCG 地质评价,其中微断层、煤的黏结性 和膨胀性、上覆含水层距离 3 个因素具有“ 一票否决” 作用,进而提出了面向 UCG 项目风险控制的 地质评价与优选基本思路。

     

    Abstract: Underground coal gasification (UCG) is an inescapable choice for the development of China’s coal indus- try,and geological risk control is the primary basis for the success of a UCG project. The general goal of risk control for a drilling-style UCG project is divided into four sub-goals,i.e.,the geological feasibility of geo-reactor construction,the easiness of gasification production,the safety of gasification process and the economy of production. The causal rela- tionship between geological conditions and potential risks is discussed,and a new idea of geological analysis and evaluation of an UCG project is proposed. The analysis shows that the high-quality completion of the UCG wells is reflected in the stability of borehole wall and the controllability of borehole trajectory,in which the key geological factor of the former is the coal-body structure or coal seam strength,while the latter is mainly controlled by the thickness,structure, occurrence and stability of coal seam. The geological evaluation on the controllability of the UCG production focuses on two objectives. One is the controllability of the gasification working face’and the coal seams with moderate dip an- gles are conducive to the advancement of the face. It is difficult to promote the face of coal seams with high ignition point. The coal seam with complex structure is not conducive to gasification. Micro-structure is unfavorable to the UCG process control. Other is the easiness of channel control in the UCG layer and the easiness decreases significantly with the increase of coal seam depth. The high cohesive and swelling coal seam will seriously endanger the openness of the channel. The coal seam with higher ash melting point and thermal stability is easier to keep the channel un- blocked. The geological analysis of the UCG process safety also includes two aspects. One is the safety of the UCG pro- duction,the excessive water inflow will cause the hidden risk of production safety,and the key to ensure the safety is to cover an aquiclude with sufficient thickness and stability. Other is the environmental safety of the UCG project,the land subsidence of the UCG project is not significant on the whole,the organic pollution potential is highly related to the coal type,and the high attention is paid to the effect of harmful elements with medium to difficult volatili- ty to environment. The economy of the UCG development mainly involves three aspects,i.e.,the gasification effective- ness,syngas quality and resource reliability,which are closely related to some specific factors such as the chemical re- activity,ash yield,exploration degree and resources of coal. The joint UCG-CBM (coalbed methane) production is an exploratory way to improve the economy of UCG. In fact,most of the geological factors are related to the above four sub-objectives of risk control,and there are cross influences to various degree. Therefore,it is necessary to participate in the geological evaluation of the UCG project based on relative contribution of factors. Among them, three factors,namely,micro-fault,coal cohesiveness and expansibility,and overlying aquifer distance,have the “one vote ve- to” effect. Furthermore,the basic idea of geological evaluation and optimization for the risk control of an UCG project is proposed.

     

/

返回文章
返回