LIU Yong, CHEN Changjiang, WEI Jianping, et al. Comparison analysis on the rock breakage pressure induced by abrasive water jets and abrasive gas jets[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2018, (9): 2510-2517. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2017.1770
Citation: LIU Yong, CHEN Changjiang, WEI Jianping, et al. Comparison analysis on the rock breakage pressure induced by abrasive water jets and abrasive gas jets[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2018, (9): 2510-2517. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2017.1770

Comparison analysis on the rock breakage pressure induced by abrasive water jets and abrasive gas jets

More Information
  • Available Online: April 10, 2023
  • Published Date: September 29, 2018
  • In order to verify the feasibility of rock breaking by abrasive gas jet,the effect of abrasive water jet and abra- sive gas jet on rock breaking is compared and analyzed. In this paper,the mechanism of abrasive acceleration in abra- sive water jet and abrasive gas jet is theoretically analyzed. The numerical relationship between the abrasive kinetic en- ergy and inlet pressure of abrasive water jet and abrasive gas jet is obtained. Based on the unified strength theory,the energy criterion for rock breaking by abrasive jet is established,and the critical energy required for rock failure is ob- tained. Based on the accelerated theory of abrasive and the critical energy of rock failure,the critical rock velocity and the required inlet pressure of rock are calculated. Based on the theoretical calculation results,the crushing effect of ab- rasive water jet and abrasive gas jet on limestone erosion is experimentally studied. The results show that when the ab- rasive speed reaches 270 m / s,the required gas jet pressure theoretical value is 15 MPa,the water jet pressure theoretical value is 45 MPa. Two kinds of abrasive jet erosion pits are shaped with “V” type. Compared with the abrasive gas jet,the shape of the crater of abrasive water jet has the characteristics of “small mouth” and “ deep pit”. The size of the erosion crater formed by the abrasive gas jet is larger than that of the abrasive water jet.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 杨尚,宁建国,王俊,高明涛,史新帅,张朝辉. 动载作用下锚固体动态失稳试验研究. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2025(02): 409-426 .
    2. 刘学生,李国庆,李学斌,谭云亮,陈艾,范德源. 一种新型锚杆托盘及其动力学响应模拟研究. 矿业研究与开发. 2024(05): 124-134 .
    3. 尚江淮,缪易辰,潘文,彭启友,李蕊雪,袁勋. 锚杆减振缓冲结构动力学响应模拟研究. 材料导报. 2024(S2): 422-428 .
    4. 吴拥政,付玉凯,周鹏赫,山世昌. 30 000 J多功能落锤冲击试验机研制及应用. 煤炭学报. 2023(02): 623-635 . 本站查看
    5. 程利兴,郭洁,高斌,周翔,李灵博,高健勋,李永元,李靖宇,李义朝,汪占领,周鹏赫. 轴向冲击荷载下锚索动力响应特征试验研究. 采矿与岩层控制工程学报. 2023(04): 35-43 .
    6. 刘超,王文杰,黄永祥,贾稳宏,朱大铭. 爆破动载下全长锚固玻璃钢锚杆累积受力特征研究. 金属矿山. 2023(08): 205-213 .
    7. 王琦,辛忠欣,江贝,王鸣子,何满潮,魏华勇. 恒阻吸能材料及锚固体力学特性研究与应用(英文). Journal of Central South University. 2023(10): 3361-3373 .
    8. 杜学领. 矿用锚杆物理实验研究方法述评. 煤矿安全. 2023(12): 97-115 .
    9. 孙洋. 锚杆自动化生产设备的整体稳定性动态调控方法. 煤矿机械. 2022(03): 155-159 .
    10. 王爱文,范德威,潘一山,赵宝友,代连朋. 扩胀-摩擦式吸能防冲锚索及其力学特性. 煤炭学报. 2022(02): 695-710 . 本站查看
    11. 宁建国,李壮,王俊,邢闯闯,沈圳. 动态拉应力波作用下锚固体力学响应试验研究. 采矿与安全工程学报. 2022(04): 731-740 .
    12. 查文华,王荣荣,王京九,梁译文,杨国威,刘小虎. 抗大变形麻花锚杆力学特性试验及数值模拟研究. 采矿与安全工程学报. 2022(05): 940-950 .
    13. 陈可夯,王朋飞,翟黎伟. 特厚煤层孤岛工作面全煤巷道锚索支护技术研究与应用. 煤矿安全. 2021(12): 106-114 .

    Other cited types(14)

Catalog

    Article views (533) PDF downloads (133) Cited by(27)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return
    x Close Forever Close