Citation: | PANG Mingkun,PAN Hongyu,ZHU Shipeng,et al. Determination of pre-Darcy/Darcy/non-Darcy seepage patterns in coal around extraction boreholes[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2024,49(S2):1025−1032. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2023.0695 |
The stress concentration phenomenon in extraction drill holes easily leads to different degrees of damage to the coal body structure around the holes, and the redistribution of stress also causes the formation of a large number of pores and fissure networks around the holes. In order to accurately determine the effective extraction radius of coal seam gas and then reasonably determine the hole spacing, it is proposed to give a kind of “three-zone” gas flow pattern around the hole by accurately determining the gas flow pattern in the coal body around the extraction hole. It is proposed to give a new method for determining the gas flow pattern in the coal by accurately determining the gas flow pattern in the pore and fissure around the extraction boreholes. To this end, a variable porosity triaxial seepage test system was designed independently to determine the changing law of permeability of coal body around the extraction boreholes under different stress conditions, and the Kozney-Carman equation was applied to correct the Reynolds number Re, which is an indicator of the determination of the flow pattern, so as to obtain the critical conditions for the determination of the three typical seepage patterns (pre-Darcy, Darcy, and Forchheimer-type non-Darcy). The results show that: ① the gas seepage under low Reynolds number belongs to the pre-Darcy stage, and the penetration resistance mainly comes from the viscous force of gas itself, which exists only when the flow velocity vs ≤ 0.062 m/s; the flow velocity curve has an inflexion point at Rep > 15, which is a weakly inertial region, where the viscous and inertial effects co-exist. At this time, the pressure drop of the gas through the coal medium around the hole is inversely proportional to the Reynolds number, which is due to the capillary force in the coal body around the hole restricting the flow of gas. ② The seepage process of high Reynolds number is basically a turbulent state, and the test found that there is a non-linear phase of the seepage process of the coal medium around the hole, which indicates that the coal medium’s own internal structure has little effect on the flow rate of the gas, and the inertial effect of the flow is the main factor of the frictional resistance, the inertial effect is a major factor of the frictional resistance. The inertia effect during the flow process is the main factor of friction resistance, and the size of inertia resistance can be calculated by the second-order velocity correlation term in Darcy’s equation, and the inertia zone of the coal medium particles around the peripore starts from vs > 0.086 m/s. ③ By analysing the three typical seepage patterns of the coal body pore and fissure media around the peripore, the Reynolds number calculation methods under different seepage patterns are calculated, and the critical Reynolds number value for the determination of the permeability flow pattern is given, and the value of Reynolds number for the determination of permeability flow pattern is found. When Re√K is greater than 3.29, the whole seepage process belongs to the non-Darcy Forchheimer state, and the value calculated at this time is the critical condition for nonlinear flow (Rep > 0.18). Combined with the above conclusions, the radius of coal seam gas extraction can be accurately determined in coal seam gas pre-pumping work by using the improved method of calculating the seepage pattern of the coal body around the hole, so as to provide an important theoretical basis for the design of the drilling hole layout method.
[1] |
李树刚,张静非,尚建选,等. 双碳目标下煤气同采技术体系构想及内涵[J]. 煤炭学报,2022,47(4):1416−1429.
LI Shugang, ZHANG Jingfei, SHANG Jianxuan, et al. Conception and connotation of coal and gas co-extraction technology system under the goal of carbon peak and carbon neutrality[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2022,47(4):1416−1429.
|
[2] |
袁亮. 我国煤炭主体能源安全高质量发展的理论技术思考[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2023,38(1):11−22.
YUAN Liang. Theory and technology considerations on high-quality development of coal main energy security in China[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2023,38(1):11−22.
|
[3] |
李泉新,许超,刘建林,等. 煤矿井下全域化瓦斯抽采定向钻进关键技术与工程实践[J]. 煤炭学报,2022,47(8):3108−3116.
LI Quanxin, XU Chao, LIU Jianlin, et al. Key technology and engineering practice of directional drilling for all-area gas extraction in underground coal mines[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2022,47(8):3108−3116.
|
[4] |
林海飞,季鹏飞,孔祥国,等. 顺层钻孔预抽煤层瓦斯精准布孔模式及工程实践[J]. 煤炭学报,2022,47(3):1220−1234.
LIN Haifei, JI Pengfei, KONG Xiangguo, et al. Precise borehole placement model and engineering practice for pre-draining coal seam gas by drilling along seam[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2022,47(3):1220−1234.
|
[5] |
黄炳香,赵兴龙,余斌,等. 煤与共伴生战略性金属矿产协调开采理论与技术构想[J]. 煤炭学报,2022,47(7):2516−2533.
HUANG Bingxiang, ZHAO Xinglong, YU Bin, et al. Research framework of theory and technology for coordinated mining of coal and its co-existed and associated strategic metal minerals[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2022,47(7):2516−2533.
|
[6] |
程远平,董骏,李伟,等. 负压对瓦斯抽采的作用机制及在瓦斯资源化利用中的应用[J]. 煤炭学报,2017,42(6):1466−1474.
CHENG Yuanping, DONG Jun, LI Wei, et al. Effect of negative pressure on coalbed methane extraction and application in the utilization of methane resource[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2017,42(6):1466−1474.
|
[7] |
PANG M K, PAN H Y, JI B N, et al. Experimental investigation of flow regime transition characteristics of fractured coal bodies around gas extraction boreholes[J]. Energy,2023,270:126758. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.126758
|
[8] |
程远平,胡彪. 微孔填充:煤中甲烷的主要赋存形式[J]. 煤炭学报,2021,46(9):2933−2948.
CHENG Yuanping, HU Biao. Main occurrence form of methane in coal:Micropore filling[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2021,46(9):2933−2948.
|
[9] |
王磊,陈礼鹏,刘怀谦,等. 不同初始瓦斯压力下煤体动力学特性及其劣化特征[J]. 岩土力学,2023,44(1):144−158.
WANG Lei, CHEN Lipeng, LIU Huaiqian, et al. Dynamic behaviors and deterioration characteristics of coal under different initial gas pressures[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2023,44(1):144−158.
|
[10] |
PANG M K, ZHANG T J, LI Y, et al. Experimental investigation of water-gas mixed seepage parameters characteristics in broken coal medium[J]. Energy Reports,2022,8:281−289.
|
[11] |
李树刚,杨二豪,林海飞,等. 深部开采卸压瓦斯精准抽采体系构建及实践[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2021,49(5):1−10.
LI Shugang, YANG Erhao, LIN Haifei, et al. Construction and practice of accurate gas drainage system for pressure relief gas in deep mining[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2021,49(5):1−10.
|
[12] |
冯学敏,陈胜宏. 含复杂裂隙网络岩体渗流特性研究的复合单元法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(5):918−924.
FENG Xuemin, CHEN Shenghong. Composite element method for seepage characteristics study on rock masses with complicated fracture network[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2006,25(5):918−924.
|
[13] |
MA D, DUAN H Y, ZHANG J X, et al. Numerical simulation of water–silt inrush hazard of fault rock:A three-phase flow model[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering,2022,55(8):5163−5182. doi: 10.1007/s00603-022-02878-9
|
[14] |
HUO Q H, WANG Y H, CHEN H J, et al. Coal-based sulfur hybrid sorbent for removal of Hg0 from flue gas. Part 1. High inorganic sulfur coal[J]. Fuel,2022,312:122973. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122973
|
[15] |
TADRIST L, MISCEVIC M, RAHLI O, et al. About the use of fibrous materials in compact heat exchangers[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science,2004,28(2/3):193−199. doi: 10.1016/S0894-1777(03)00039-6
|
[16] |
PAEK J W, KANG B H, KIM S Y, et al. Effective thermal conductivity and permeability of aluminum foam Materials1[J]. International Journal of Thermophysics,2000,21(2):453−464. doi: 10.1023/A:1006643815323
|
[17] |
YU B Y, CHEN Z Q, DING Q L, et al. Non-Darcy flow seepage characteristics of saturated broken rocks under compression with lateral constraint[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology,2016,26(6):1145−1151. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2016.09.025
|
[18] |
LIU Z D, LI J Q, ZHAO Q L, et al. Gradation design of phosphorus tailing–graded waste rock subgrade filling using discrete element method[J]. Minerals,2022,12(5):573. doi: 10.3390/min12050573
|
[19] |
ZHANG T J, PANG M K, JI X, et al. Dynamic response of a non-darcian seepage system in the broken coal of a Karst collapse pillar[J]. Mine Water and the Environment,2021,40(3):713−721. doi: 10.1007/s10230-021-00760-8
|
[20] |
田虎楠,唐巨鹏,潘一山,等. 平均有效应力对煤系页岩瓦斯微观吸附−解吸特性影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学,2022,43(7):1803−1815.
TIAN Hunan, TANG Jupeng, PAN Yishan, et al. Experimental study on the effect of average effective stress on micro adsorption and desorption characteristics of coal shale gas[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2022,43(7):1803−1815.
|
[21] |
SUI L, WANG H, WU J, et al. Fractal description of rock fracture networks based on the space syntax metric[J]. Fractal and Fractional, 2022, 6(7): 353.
|
[22] |
MA D, DUAN H Y, ZHANG J X. Solid grain migration on hydraulic properties of fault rocks in underground mining tunnel:Radial seepage experiments and verification of permeability prediction[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2022,126:104525. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2022.104525
|
[23] |
LIU Z, SHENG K H, YANG H, et al. Numerical simulation study and application of coal seepage evolution law around water injection borehole in the stope “dynamic-static” pressure zone[J]. Measurement,2022,195:111107. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111107
|
[24] |
XU H, QIN Y P, WU F, et al. Numerical modeling of gas extraction from coal seam combined with a dual-porosity model:Finite difference solution and multi-factor analysis[J]. Fuel,2022,313:122687. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122687
|