XU Yajun,ZHANG Sai,PANG Xiaoliang,et al. Study on jerky dynamic characteristics of energy absorbing materials based on impact test[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2024,49(S2):1322−1330. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2023.0713
Citation: XU Yajun,ZHANG Sai,PANG Xiaoliang,et al. Study on jerky dynamic characteristics of energy absorbing materials based on impact test[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2024,49(S2):1322−1330. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2023.0713

Study on jerky dynamic characteristics of energy absorbing materials based on impact test

More Information
  • Received Date: June 08, 2023
  • Revised Date: November 20, 2023
  • Available Online: January 23, 2025
  • In order to study the energy absorption effect and dynamic response characteristics of silicon-based strain rate-sensitive energy-absorbing materials under impact load, impact tests of energy-absorbing materials were conducted on the 6000 kN hydraulic leg impact test platform at the Beijing Mining Support Equipment Testing and Inspection Center of the Coal Science Research Institute. The jerky theory was employed to analyze the energy absorbing effect and dynamic response. Mathematical expressions relating object speed, displacement, and impact energy were derived for varying external forces, and theoretical predictions were validated by experimental measurements. The results indicate that the silicon-based material exhibits rapid response time, high energy absorption capacity, prolonged time delay, peak removal, vibration elimination and damage resistance during impact. Specifically, the response time of the energy-absorbing material was measured to be approximately 35 ms when tested with the hydraulic leg, the maximum pressure in the lower chamber of the hydraulic leg during the impact process is 36.85 MPa, while the hydraulic leg without energy-absorbing material protection has a maximum pressure of 59 MPa when impacted. During the impact, the lower chamber of the hydraulic leg reduced by 61.9% maximum pressure, with the energy-absorbing material accounting for 80% of the total impact energy absorbed. Moreover, the impact time was 8 times longer than that of the non-energy absorbing material, while remaining stable with no significant fluctuation during the process. The structure of the material also remained intact except for some plastic deformation on the contact surface. These findings, consistent with the jerky theory, provide valuable insights for the design and selection of materials for hydraulic-powered support in anti-impact applications.

  • [1]
    齐庆新,潘一山,舒龙勇,等. 煤矿深部开采煤岩动力灾害多尺度分源防控理论与技术架构[J]. 煤炭学报,2018,43(7):1801−1810.

    QI Qingxin, PAN Yishan, SHU Longyong, et al. Theory and technical framework of prevention and control with different sources in multi-scales for coal and rock dynamic disasters in deep mining of coal mines[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2018,43(7):1801−1810.
    [2]
    刘军,欧阳振华,齐庆新,等. 深部冲击地压矿井刚柔一体化吸能支护技术[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2013,41(6):17−20.

    LIU Jun, OUYANG Zhenhua, QI Qingxin, et al. Rigid-flexibility integrated energy absorption support technology applied in deep mine with pressure bumping[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2013,41(6):17−20.
    [3]
    姜耀东,赵毅鑫. 我国煤矿冲击地压的研究现状:机制、预警与控制[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2015,34(11):2188−2204.

    JIANG Yaodong, ZHAO Yixin. State of the art:Investigation on mechanism, forecast and control of coal bumps in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2015,34(11):2188−2204.
    [4]
    齐庆新,李一哲,赵善坤,等. 我国煤矿冲击地压发展70年:理论与技术体系的建立与思考[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2019,47(9):1−40.

    QI Qingxin, LI Yizhe, ZHAO Shankun, et al. Seventy years development of coal mine rockburst in China:Establishment and consideration of theory and technology system[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2019,47(9):1−40.
    [5]
    潘一山,王凯兴,肖永惠. 基于摆型波理论的防冲支护设计[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2013,32(8):1537−1543.

    PAN Yishan, WANG Kaixing, XIAO Yonghui. Design of anti-scour support based on theory of pendulum-type wave[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2013,32(8):1537−1543.
    [6]
    吴拥政,付玉凯,何杰,等. 深部冲击地压巷道“卸压−支护−防护” 协同防控原理与技术[J]. 煤炭学报,2021,46(1):132−144.

    WU Yongzheng, FU Yukai, HE Jie, et al. Principle and technology of “pressure relief-support-protection” collaborative prevention and control in deep rock burst roadway[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2021,46(1):132−144.
    [7]
    吕祥锋. 刚−柔耦合支护防治冲击地压机理研究[D]. 阜新:辽宁工程技术大学,2012.

    LV Xiangfeng. Study on mechanism of rigid-flexible coupling support for preventing rock burst[D]. Fuxin:Liaoning Technical University, 2012.
    [8]
    肖永惠,潘一山,陈建强,等. 巷道防冲支架吸能构件屈曲吸能可靠性研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报,2022,39(2):317−327.

    XIAO Yonghui, PAN Yishan, CHEN Jianqiang, et al. Buckling energy absorption reliability of energy absorption component of roadway rockburst preventing support[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering,2022,39(2):317−327.
    [9]
    高明仕,赵一超,温颖远,等. 震源扰动型巷道冲击矿压破坏力能准则及实践[J]. 煤炭学报,2016,41(4):808−814.

    GAO Mingshi, ZHAO Yichao, WEN Yingyuan, et al. Stress and energy criterion of the roadway destruction subjected to disturbance type rock burst and its practice[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(4):808−814.
    [10]
    徐连满,马柳,姜笑楠,等. 冲击地压载荷下O型棚支架动力响应规律研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2022,50(4):49−57.

    XU Lianman, MA Liu, JIANG Xiaonan, et al. Study on dynamic response law of O-shaped support under rockburst loading[J]. Coal Science and Technology,2022,50(4):49−57.
    [11]
    张守中. 爆炸与冲击动力学[M]. 北京:兵器工业出版社,1993:19.

    ZHANG Shouzhong. Dynamics of explosion and shock[M]. Beijing: Weapon Industry Press, 1993:19.
    [12]
    徐亚军,李丁一,刘欣科,等. 液压支架垂向刚度实验测试与理论研究[J]. 煤矿开采,2019,1(1):40−44,52.

    XU Yajun, LI Dingyi, LIU Xinke, et al. Theoretical analysis and testing of vertical stiffness of hydraulic support[J]. Coal Mining Technology,2019,1(1):40−44,52.
    [13]
    冯斌. 液压油有效体积弹性模量及测量装置的研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学,2011.

    FENG Bin. Study on effective volume elastic modulus of hydraulic oil and its measuring device[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University, 2011.
    [14]
    周志刚. 液压系统工作介质研究[J]. 筑路机械与施工机械化,2012,29(6):86−88.

    ZHOU Zhigang. Research on working medium of hydraulic system[J]. Road Machinery & Construction Mechanization,2012,29(6):86−88.
    [15]
    INZ S J. Nonlinear dynamical models and jerky motion[J]. American Journal of Physics,1997,65(6):523−526. doi: 10.1119/1.18594
    [16]
    黄沛天,徐学翔,马善钧,等. 牛顿猝变动力学中的新守恒量[J]. 江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2007,31(2):115−116,121.

    HUANG Peitian, XU Xuexiang, MA Shanjun, et al. New conserved quantities in Newtonian jerky dynamics[J]. Journal of Jiangxi Normal University (Natural Sciences Edition),2007,31(2):115−116,121.
    [17]
    郭振华. 介绍一个新和力学量—急动度[J]. 广西物理,1999,20(3):9−12.

    GUO Zhenhua. A new mechanical quantity-jerk is introduced[J]. Guangxi Physics, 1999, 20(3):9−11.
    [18]
    黄沛天. 一个描写机械运动的新概念:急动度[J]. 物理,1981,10(7):394−397.

    HUANG Peitian. A new concept to describe mechanical motion-jerkiness[J]. Physics,1981,10(7):394−397.
    [19]
    SPROTT J C. Some simple chaotic jerk functions[J]. American Journal of Physics,1997,65(6):537−543. doi: 10.1119/1.18585
    [20]
    黄沛天,马善钧. 从传统牛顿力学到当今猝变动力学[J]. 大学物理,2006,25(1):1−3,10.

    HUANG Peitian, MA Shanjun. From traditional Newtonian mechanics to the jerky dynamics of today[J]. College Physics,2006,25(1):1−3,10.
    [21]
    黄沛天,黄文,胡利云. 变加速运动理论与实践意义初探[J]. 江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2003,27(1):8−11.

    HUANG Peitian, HUANG Wen, HU Liyun. A preliminary probe into the meaning on theory and practice of varying accelerated motion[J]. Journal of Jiangxi Normal University (Natural Sciences Edition),2003,27(1):8−11.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 王海宾,贾传伟,张思华,孙文亮,陈德峰,张同俊,张士川,杨华帅,张搏明,李杨杨,刘英锋,樊敏. 彬长矿区矿井涌水量与开采参数关联性分析及预测研究. 采矿与安全工程学报. 2025(01): 73-84 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (14) PDF downloads (2) Cited by(1)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return
    x Close Forever Close