Citation: | WANG Xiaoqing. Effect of rock bolt pretension on anchoring and bearing characteristics of fractured rock mass[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2024,49(S2):606−615. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2023.1513 |
Gravel bolting test is the basic test method to study the support mechanism of rock bolts for fractured rock mass. The compression zone formed by rock bolt pretension is usually used to explain the gravel bolting mechanism, the test results show that the gravel body can be successfully bolted under low or even no pretension, which shows that it is not appropriate, at least not sufficient, to explain the gravel bolting phenomenon using the compression zone. In order to obtain the influence mechanism of rock bolt pretension on the anchoring and bearing characteristics of fractured rock mass, the numerical simulation method of gravel bolting and the pretension imposing method were developed. Gravel bolting laboratory and numerical tests under low and high pretensions were carried out, respectively. Based on the above tests, the formation and instability process of bearing structure and the force evolution law of rock bolts were analyzed, and the gravel bolting mechanism and the bearing-instability characteristics of anchoring structure were fully revealed. The results show that: ① The proposed numerical simulation method of gravel bolting and the pretension imposing method are feasible, which can simulate the gravel bolting tests under different pretensions, and overcome the malpractice that the contact forces between gravel particles can not be fully obtained in laboratory tests. ② Under the conditions of low pretension and high pretension, the gravel can be successfully anchored by rock bolts, but the anchoring mechanisms under different pretensions are different. Under low pretension, the pressure arch bearing structure is formed in the bolted gravel, and the pressure arch carries all the weight of the gravel. The rock bolts mainly play the role of suspension and only bears the weight of the gravel below the pressure arch, with low forces in rock bolts. Under high pretension, the bearing structure of compression zone is formed in the bolted gravel. The rock bolts mainly play the role of pre-tightening and has a large force. ③ When the pressure arch structure is loaded, the height of the pressure arch decreases continuously, and the internal contact force in the pressure arch first increases and then decreases, until the pressure arch structure is completely destroyed, and the corresponding rock bolt force increases at first and then decreases. When the compression zone structure is loaded, the compression zone is destroyed at first, and the corresponding rock bolt force decreases, and then the bearing structure changes from the compression zone to the pressure arch structure, and the rock bolt force increases and then decreases. ④ There is a significant positive correlation between the bearing capacity of bolted gravel and the inner stress in the bolted gravel. The internal stress in the compression zone structure is much larger than that in the pressure arch structure, so that the peak value of the inner stress in the bolted gravel under high pretension is much higher than that under low pretension, which is the reason why the bearing capacity of compression zone is much larger than that of pressure arch.
[1] |
LANG T A. Theory and practice of rock bolting[J]. Transactions of the American Institute of Mining Engineers, 1961, 220:333–348.
|
[2] |
HOEK E, BROWN E T. Underground excavations in rock[M]. London:Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, 1980.
|
[3] |
KANG H P, LI J Z, YUAN G Y, et al. Mechanisms of rockbolt support for highly fractured rock masses–insight from physical and numerical modeling[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,2022,81(5):198. doi: 10.1007/s10064-022-02696-x
|
[4] |
李建忠,高富强,娄金福,等. 破碎岩体锚固及承载失稳机制研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报,2022,39(6):1125−1134.
LI Jianzhong, GAO Fuqiang, LOU Jinfu, et al. Study on reinforcement and bearing-instability mechanism of broken rock mass[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering,2022,39(6):1125−1134.
|
[5] |
孟波,靖洪文,吴疆宇,等. 破碎岩石锚固结构承载力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2023,42(12):3020−3030.
MENG Bo, JING Hongwen, WU Jiangyu, et al. Model test study on bearing mechanical properties of anchored gravels[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2023,42(12):3020−3030.
|
[6] |
WANG X Q, KANG H P, GAO F Q. Numerical study on the formation of pressure arch in bolted gravel plate[J]. Computers and Geotechnics,2021,130:103933. doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103933
|
[7] |
王晓卿,康红普,高富强,等. 碎石锚固中压力拱形成与锚杆作用分析[J]. 煤炭学报,2021,46(10):3139−3147.
WANG Xiaoqing, KANG Hongpu, GAO Fuqiang, et al. Analysis of pressure arch formation and rockbolt function in gravel bolting[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2021,46(10):3139−3147.
|
[8] |
康红普,姜铁明,高富强. 预应力在锚杆支护中的作用[J]. 煤炭学报,2007,32(7):680−685. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9993.2007.07.002
KANG Hongpu, JIANG Tieming, GAO Fuqiang. Effect of pretensioned stress to rock bolting[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2007,32(7):680−685. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9993.2007.07.002
|
[9] |
林健,石壵,孙志勇,等. 端部锚固锚杆预应力场分布特征的大型模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2016,35(11):2237−2247.
LIN Jian, SHI Zhuang, SUN Zhiyong, et al. Large scale model test on the distribution characteristics of the prestressed field of end-anchored bolts[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2016,35(11):2237−2247.
|
[10] |
康红普. 煤矿井下应力场类型及相互作用分析[J]. 煤炭学报,2008,33(12):1329−1335. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9993.2008.12.001
KANG Hongpu. Analysis on types and interaction of stress fields in underground coal mines[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2008,33(12):1329−1335. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9993.2008.12.001
|
[11] |
康红普,姜鹏飞,蔡嘉芳. 锚杆支护应力场测试与分析[J]. 煤炭学报,2014,39(8):1521−1529.
KANG Hongpu, JIANG Pengfei, CAI Jiafang. Test and analysis on stress fields caused by rock bolting[J]. Journal of China Coal Society,2014,39(8):1521−1529.
|
[12] |
LI C C. Rock support design based on the concept of pressure arch[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2006,43(7):1083−1090.
|
[13] |
LI C C. Principles of rockbolting design[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering,2017,9(3):396−414. doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.04.002
|
[14] |
KONG X X, LIU Q S, ZHANG Q B, et al. A method to estimate the pressure arch formation above underground excavation in rock mass[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2018,71:382−390. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2017.09.004
|
[15] |
ZHANG Z X, XU Y, KULATILAKE P H S W, et al. Physical model test and numerical analysis on the behavior of stratified rock masses during underground excavation[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2012,49:134−147.
|
[16] |
杨锡武,张永兴. 山区公路高填方涵洞的成拱效应及土压力计算理论研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(21):3887−3893. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2005.21.013
YANG Xiwu, ZHANG Yongxing. Study on arch action and earth pressure theory for culverts under high embankment[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2005,24(21):3887−3893. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2005.21.013
|
[17] |
向先超,张华,蒋国盛,等. 基于颗粒流的抗滑桩土拱效应研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2011,33(3):386−391.
XIANG Xianchao, ZHANG Hua, JIANG Guosheng, et al. Soil arching effect of anti-slide piles based on particle flow method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2011,33(3):386−391.
|
[18] |
李盛,王起才,马莉,等. 黄土地区高填土明洞土拱效应及土压力减载计算[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2014,33(5):1055−1062.
LI Sheng, WANG Qicai, MA Li, et al. Earth pressure and soil arch effect for high fill open cut tunnel in loess area under different load reduction schemes[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2014,33(5):1055−1062.
|
[19] |
Itasca Consulting Group. PFC3D (Particle Flow Code in 3 Dimensions) theory and background [M]. Itasca:Itasca Con-sulting Group, 2008.
|
1. |
程久龙,姜成麟,李垚,白仁喜. 钻孔瞬变电磁法方位线圈扫描探测定位方法. 煤炭学报. 2024(01): 616-627 .
![]() | |
2. |
屈少波,朱姣,姜志海,李毛飞,何治隆. 复杂地形瞬变电磁三维正演模拟与地形效应分析. 煤田地质与勘探. 2024(04): 137-151 .
![]() | |
3. |
朱姣,姜志海,殷长春,邱长凯,李毛飞,高兆丰. 金属干扰环境下矿井瞬变电磁有限元正演模拟研究. 煤炭学报. 2024(11): 4578-4589 .
![]() | |
4. |
程久龙,姜国庆,李垚,田楚霄,孟上,梁沛元. 钻孔瞬变电磁法扫描探测磁芯线圈激励电磁场响应特征. 煤炭学报. 2023(03): 1302-1310 .
![]() | |
5. |
朱榕,王耀,许洋铖,郑万波,刘常昊,谭春琳,吴燕清,杨志全. 矿井顶板水害瞬变电磁正演模拟及应用. 昆明理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(03): 62-71 .
![]() | |
6. |
张永超. 半空间条件下瞬变电磁法斜阶跃效应影响时段刍议. 地球物理学进展. 2023(04): 1695-1701 .
![]() | |
7. |
张军. 矿井孔中瞬变电磁探测异常响应特征模拟. 煤田地质与勘探. 2022(08): 134-141 .
![]() | |
8. |
王树奇,黄茸茸,吴楠. 井下采空区时域不连续伽辽金法电磁正演. 西安科技大学学报. 2021(02): 348-354 .
![]() | |
9. |
邱浩. 煤层气富集矿井采空区瞬变电磁波场变换成像技术. 重庆大学学报. 2021(10): 130-138 .
![]() | |
10. |
王国栋. 上社矿15号煤层上覆采空区富水性瞬变电磁探测技术分析. 煤矿现代化. 2020(05): 183-186 .
![]() |